A Quest for a Unified Worldview

There appears to be a fundamental divergence between our everyday perspective and the scientific perspective.
For instance, in our daily lives, we generally assume that humans possess a degree of free will, enabling us to act voluntarily. Science, however, tends to fundamentally negate the concept of human free will. From a scientific standpoint, human will and actions are often considered to be determined by factors such as genetics, environmental conditioning, or neural information processing in the brain.
Furthermore, in our everyday experience, we perceive animals like dogs and cats, and even plants, not as mere machines but as entities endowed with life or a vital force. Science, conversely, generally does not acknowledge such a vitalistic principle. In the scientific framework, organisms are essentially complex collections of molecules that obey the laws of physics and chemistry, and in this sense, are not fundamentally distinct from machines.
This critical friction results in the divergence between the everyday and scientific ways of seeing and understanding the world, seemingly doomed to stay separated forever.
My research aims to reconcile these two seemingly contradictory perspectives. I intend to establish a coherent, unified viewpoint, and consequently a unified worldview by taking the philosophy of the French philosopher Raymond Ruyer (1902–1987) as a key intellectual reference.
Ultimately, my objective is to construct a form of social theory or political philosophy grounded in this consolidated and integrated worldview.